Legal Opinion
Oswego Falls Corp. v. American Seal-Kap Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1946No. Civil Action No. 2269PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This is a patent cause in which the usual issues of validity and infringement require decision.
The plaintiff owns Wright and Pierce Patents Nos. 1,857,073, 1,857,075 and 1,884,-952, to be called for convenience herein the 073, 075 and 952 Patents, respectively. Each is entitled “Hood Capping Container”, and the dates are:
073 Application September 26,1925; date May 3, 1932
075 Application November 2, 1925; date May 3, 1932
952 Application May 9, 1929; date Oct. 25, 1932
The noun “Container” in the title is misleading, for in each instance a machine is described for affixing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Larson v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Holland Co. v. American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Helbush v. FinkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Stearns v. RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Associated Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.