Legal Opinion
Stearns v. Rasor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1955No. 13634PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
Appellants sued appellees in the United States Court, Southern District of California, Central Division, charging by their Second Amended Complaint that appellees had infringed claims 1 and 7 of United States Letters Patent No. 2,332,1821 (hereinafter “the Stearns patent”), and praying for an injunction, an accounting, and damages. Appellees, by answer, raised the defenses that: the claims in suit were invalid for want of invention and because they do not particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention; the claims in suit were not infringed by appellees; and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Dick E. Stearns and the D. E. Stearns Company, a Partnership Composed of Dick E. Stearns and Ellen Belson Stearns v. Tinker & Rasor, a Corporation, John P. Rasor and Leo H. Tinker, Tinker & Rasor, a Corporation, John P. Rasor and Leo H. Tinker v. Dick E. Stearns and the D. E. Stearns Company, a Partnership Composed of Dick E. Stearns and Ellen Belson StearnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958