Legal Opinion
Plummer v. Special Indemnity Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1998No. 90138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This is a proceeding to review an order of a Workers’ Compensation Court three-judge panel affirming the trial court’s order directing the Special Indemnity Fund to pay postjudgment interest on an unpaid award of permanent partial disability benefits. The claimant contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in failing to calculate postjudgment interest pursuant to the applicable statute in effect on the date the Fund was ordered to pay interest. Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we vacate the order and remand the matter with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Fleming v. Baptist General ConventionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loftis v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. HowellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Special Indemnity Fund v. WinklemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999