Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Moore v. Howell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1986No. 15978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether failure to join allegedly indispensable parties to a lawsuit renders the eventual judgment void for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that it does not.

This issue is framed by a condemnation action. In 1982, the Idaho Transportation Department sought to purchase real property in Ada County as part of a highway improvement project. When negotiations failed, the state instituted condemnation proceedings against the property. William Howell, his wife, and a family business corporation were among the parties named as defendants. Howell had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
  3. Brown's Tie & Lumber Co. v. KirkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Plummer v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. ParsonsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Pro Indiviso, Inc. v. Mid-Mile Holding TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API