State Ex Rel. Moore v. Howell
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether failure to join allegedly indispensable parties to a lawsuit renders the eventual judgment void for lack of jurisdiction. We hold that it does not.
This issue is framed by a condemnation action. In 1982, the Idaho Transportation Department sought to purchase real property in Ada County as part of a highway improvement project. When negotiations failed, the state instituted condemnation proceedings against the property. William Howell, his wife, and a family business corporation were among the parties named as defendants. Howell had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
- Brown's Tie & Lumber Co. v. KirkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1972
- Plummer v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. ParsonsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pro Indiviso, Inc. v. Mid-Mile Holding TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999