Legal Opinion
Loftis v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 2003No. 97,966PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
{1 Petitioner, Clifford Loftis, Jr. (Claimant), seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Court (WCC) order finding he had no legally cognizable claim against Respondent, Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund). The order, noting undisputed facts, denied the claim "as a matter of law" based on Autry v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2001 OK 79, 38 P.3d 218. Autry involved the 1999 amendment to 85 0.8. Supp.1994 § 172, which began the dissolution of Fund by precluding its liability for permanent partial disability (PPD) in actions filed after October 31, 1999.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- In Re BomgardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. PullumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Rogers v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.