Legal Opinion

Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 14, 1892No. 1PublishedCited by 123 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OR APPEALS OR THE STATE OR NEW YORK. This case was first argued on the 23d and 24th days of October, 1888, at October term, 1888. Mr. Luden Birdseye for plaihtiff in error. Mr. E. '8. Repollo for defendant in error. On the 29th of the same month it was ordered for re'argument. It was ordered continued at that term, and also at October terms 1889, 1890 and 1891. At the present term it wTas argued on the 14th and 17th days of October.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OR APPEALS OR THE STATE OR NEW YORK. This case was first argued on the 23d and 24th days of October, 1888, at October term, 1888. Mr. Luden Birdseye for plaihtiff in error. Mr. E. '8. Repollo for defendant in error. On the 29th of the same month it was ordered for re'argument. It was ordered continued at that term, and also at October terms 1889, 1890 and 1891. At the present term it wTas argued on the 14th and 17th days of October. The caseothen made is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras

delivered the opinion of the court. •

John S. Prouty, of the city and 'State of New York, was a holder and owner of certain preferred and guaranteed stock of the Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana Railroad Company. This stock ivas issued in the city of New York, in the year 1857, and the guaranteed dividends and interest were to be there paid. Subsequently, it being alleged that the said company was in arrears of dividends and interest due Mr. Prouty as holder and owner of its stock, an action wás commenced. by him in the Supreme Court of the State Of New York in and for the city and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API