Wilson v. Moriarty
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This is an action to rescind a written lease by plaintiff to defendant of a lot and house thereon in the city of Los Angeles, on the ground of alleged fraud on the part of the defendant in procuring the lease; or if a rescission thereof cannot be had, that the lease be reformed, on the ground of alleged mistakes of the plaintiff, which the defendant knew at the time the lease was executed.
The court denied a rescission of the lease, but reformed it. From the judgment reforming the lease, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, the defendant brings this appeal.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Higgins v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilson v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Metro. Loan Ass'n v. EscheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by18 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.