Gates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This ease concerns a dispute over whether an option to purchase, in an agricultural lease with the government, can only be exercised on or before the day the annual lease payment is due, without becoming liable for the yearly lease payment. The consequences of granting the government’s motion for summary judgment would be to create a very rigid, arguably Draconian, rule that is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and past agency practice. However, denying the government’s motion may grant the plaintiff little relief since the damages plaintiff seeks appear to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Florida Department of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Berdick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- H.H.O., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Esch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Fiebelkorn v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.