Legal Opinion

Berdick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 12, 1979No. Nos. 493-78, 494-78 & 495-78PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

This case arises from the medical practice of plaintiff Kenneth Berdick, a physician in Florida who treated, almost exclusively, patients insured under the Supplemental Medical Insurance Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1395jj (1976), (Medicare). In 1976, Berdick was convicted before a Federal District Court on charges that he made false statements to the Government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1976).1 Berdick subsequently became a plaintiff in this court seeking, among other things, recovery of Medicare reimbursements on claims other than those on which he was convicted. The Government has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. McCauley v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API