Legal Opinion

Fiebelkorn v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 21, 2009No. Civ. 09-143 (RHK/SRN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case, at its core, concerns the alleged failure by Defendant IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (“IKON”) to pay commissions to a former employee, Plaintiff Kent Fiebelkorn. Fiebelkorn has asserted eight claims against IKON, four sounding in quasi-contract and four alleging violations of various Minnesota statutes. IKON has counterclaimed, seeking to recover purported overpayments of commissions and alleging that Fiebelkorn has failed to return its confidential and proprietary information. IKON now moves for summary judgment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hull v. ConvergeOne, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  2. Phillips v. Caliber Home LoansDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API