H.H.O., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This contract case is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment to dismiss a portion of the plaintiff’s claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in accordance with RUSCC 12(b). In particular, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff, H.H.O., Inc., has brought a suit which partially lies in tort, rather than in contract, and thus such portion is not within the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to the restrictions of the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1).
As discussed below, this Court has determined that there are certain material facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Aleutco Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Essen Mall Properties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Pratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- H.H.O. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.