Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Brushart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1950No. 32170PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This court is first called upon to determine whether in the absence of fraud or bad faith the courts may override a finding of a board of elections having jurisdiction of the subject matter to the effect that a declaration of candidacy and petition of a candidate for nomination to a public office is valid where no protest against such declaration of candidacy and petition has been filed with such board within the time required by statute.

The pertinent portions of Section 4785-92, General Code, read as follows:

“All separate petition papers comprising the nominating petition of a candidate for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Koehler v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. McGinley v. BlissOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Burgstaller v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Cassidy v. ZallerOhio Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State, Ex Rel. Krupa v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Kay v. KayCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API