Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burgstaller v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1948No. 31352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By The Court.

It is alleged, as grounds for the issuance of the writ, that the refusal of the board to place relator’s name on the primary ballot constituted a failure to perform an official duty; that the action of the board was “arbitrary, illegal and an abuse of discretion, and without authority of law; and * * * relator has no adequate remedy at law.” The relator does not allege fraud or corruption on the part .of the board.

Where a candidate files more than one petition form at the same time and the petition forms in the aggregate contain more than five names, has the candidate complied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Koehler v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Columbus Blank Book Mfg. Co. v. AyresOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. BrushartOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Bible v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Kroeger v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Braverman v. VitulloOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Wiethe v. Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API