Legal Opinion

Bobo v. Jewell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1988No. 87-1172PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

*3321

In Hughes v. Hughes (1988), 35 Ohio St. 3d 165, 518 N.E. 2d 1213, we faced the question of whether a domestic relations court could decree an allocation of the child dependency-exemption as permitted in Section 151, Title 26, U.S. Code, to the noncustodial parent, pursuant to the court’s broad discretion to determine the appropriate allocation of marital assets and property rights in divorce proceedings. We held that Section 152(e), Title 26, U.S. Code, applicable to tax years beginning after December 31, 1984, did not encroach upon or preempt the exclusive statutory authority of state courts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of SchiffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hughes v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Superior Metal Products, Inc. v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Pierce v. BrushartOhio Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gubernat v. DeremerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. In re EberhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Singer v. DickinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re WillhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Zachary Thomas Andrew GrimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API