State Ex Rel. McGinley v. Bliss
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
There is no dispute as to the facts.. In substance, it was stipulated that relator is qualified as an attorney at law and an elector, as required by law; that he filed his declaration of candidacy which was duly signed and verified by him; and that his. petitions were simultaneously filed and bore- the signatures of the required number of qualified electors- and registered voters.
It was stipulated further that the respondents rejected his declaration of candidacy and petitions “for the reason that such declaration of candidacy failed to mention full term or unexpired term and the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Pierce v. BrushartOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Janasik v. SarosyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Ehring v. BlissOhio Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.