Legal Opinion

Pflueger v. Sherman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 1934No. 21PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

After an extended recital of the allegations of the bill of complaint herein (a copy of which, consisting of seventy-three printed pages, is attached to the certificate) with the statement that it is not clear to the court whether this is a stockholders’ suit or one on behalf of the individual complainants, and after a further recital of proceedings in the cause, of the decree rendered in the District Court, and of certain documents filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals after a motion to dismiss an appeal from that decree, the Circuit Court of Appeals has certified to this Court the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Jewell v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carumbo v. Cape Cod S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. State of California v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. Pflueger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Spaulding v. Douglas Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Ten EyckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API