Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bunn
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 14, 1932No. 333PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
October 18, 1926, J. V. & R. T. Burkes agreed with the Investment Company, owner of certain land in Natchez, Mississippi, to construct a hotel thereon. The contract contains the following clauses—
“Article 30. Guaranty Bond. — The Owner shall have the right, prior to the signing of the contract, to require the Contractor to furnish bond covering the faithful performance of the Contract and the payment of all obligations arising thereunder, in such form as the Owner may prescribe with such sureties as he may approve. If such bond is required by instructions given previous to the. submission of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Davis v. Mercantile Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Haseltine v. Central Bank of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Schlosser v. HemphillSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bendix Aviation Corp. v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.