Legal Opinion
Spaulding v. Douglas Aircraft Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1946No. 11134PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that appellants, partner subcontractors selling airplane parts and material to appellee Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., hereinafter called Douglas, a contractor furnishing to the United States war planes of which the appellants’ materials were a part, are not entitled to payment to them of $27,580.80 due them from the contractor for such material sold it by the contractor between March 1, 1944, and July 1, 1944.
The Secretary of War, acting under section 403(c) (1) of the Renegotiation Act 2 had determined that appellants had…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. PhillipsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- United States v. Bonnell Bonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.