Legal Opinion
Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Ten Eyck
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is the same suit as Borden’s Farm Products Co. v. Baldwin (D. C.) 7 F. Supp. 352, new defendants having been substituted. In accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court (293 U. S. 194, 55 S. Ct. 187, 79 L. Ed. 281), the evidence has now been heard at great length by a special master, who has made findings of fact, has concluded as matter of law that the statute is unconstitutional and has recommended that the defendants be enjoined. It is not necessary for us to repeat the general background of the case; it is contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.