Legal Opinion

Young v. Planning Commission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1999No. 21493PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C. J.

In April 1996, plaintiff-appellant Ralph A. Young filed the instant declaratory judgment action against defendant-appellee Planning Commission of the County of Kauai [hereinafter, Kauai Planning Commission or the Commission]. In his complaint, Young alleged that his commercial tour boat operation on the Hanalei River did not constitute a “development” under the Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) chapter 205A, and the Special Management Area (SMA) Rules and Regulations of the County of Kauai [hereinafter, SMA Rules], and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Omerod v. Heirs of KaheananuiHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sprague v. California Pacific Bankers & Insurance Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Matsuyoshi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ralston v. YimHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API