Legal Opinion

Omerod v. Heirs of Kaheananui

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2007No. 27118PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

This appeal arises from a quiet title action filed in the circuit court of the third circuit 1 (the court) involving numerous parties and several dispositions. To summarize, Appellants 2 claim an undivided one-half interest in the ahupua'a 3 of Hilea Nui under the theory that Prince Lot Kamehameha (Lot) and Chief Leleiohoku (Leleiohoku) were granted a cotenancy in a single ahupua'a known as “Hilea” at the time of the Great Mahele, 4 as opposed to receiving grants in fee simple of two separate ahupua'as, Hilea Iki and Hilea Nui. They contend that Hilea Iki and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arquette v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dannenberg v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Marvin v. Pflueger.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Thomas v. Kidani.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Garner v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API