Legal Opinion

Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Matsuyoshi.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2015No. SCWC-12-0000867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

POLLACK, J.

In Ulrich v. Security Investment Co., 35 Haw. 158 (Haw.Terr.1939), we held that a personal property mortgagee seeking to enforce a non-judicial foreclosure sale bears the burden of establishing that the sale was conducted in a manner that is fair, reasonably diligent, and in good faith and that an adequate price was procured for the property. In the years after Ulrich was decided, the legislature made several amendments to the non-judicial foreclosure statute, and the viability of Ulrich in light of these amendments, as well as Ulrich’s applicability to real…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,686 Mary Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Hayes, Jr., and Eric Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Price v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hawaii Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME Local 152 v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hungate v. Law Office of David B. RosenHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Carpenter v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  4. Fergerstrom v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  5. Field v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (In re Ho)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API