Legal Opinion
Schmid v. City of Stanton
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1958No. Civ. No. 5720PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
In these proceedings petitioners sought and obtained a writ of mandate restraining the city of Stanton from taking any further action in connection with annexation to said city.
On August 8, 1956, proceedings were initiated to annex certain property to the city of Stanton. These proceedings were known as the “South Annexation” and September 24, 1956, was set as the time for hearing protests. However, on August 31, 1956, at a special meeting, the city council, by *685resolution, terminated the proceedings on said “South Annexation.” Several protests had been prepared for filing but after notice of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Strong v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Scott v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962