Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of San Pablo

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1955No. Civ. 16116, 16117; Civ. 16118, 16119PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Proceedings for the annexation of overlapping territory to the cities of San Pablo and Richmond, respectively, were in progress when proceedings in mandamus and in certiorari were instituted against each city. There resulted four separate judgments, each holding the Richmond annexation proceeding valid and the San Pablo annexation proceeding invalid. San Pablo has appealed.

If valid, the San Pablo proceeding, as the first in time, gave San Pablo jurisdiction to the exclusion of Richmond. Accordingly, we will consider first the validity of the San Pablo proceeding.

The San…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of Campbell v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Central Manufacturing District, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API