Legal Opinion

Town of Scott v. City of Merrill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The gravamen of the complaint is the appellant's alleged “circumventing and evading the requirements of sec. 66.021 (11) (b) pertaining to annexation of areas of one square mile or more of territory.” The defendant’s demurrer to the complaint has squarely raised the issue whether it is lawful for a city to employ separate annexation proceedings of smaller areas in order to obviate the statutory requirement of applying to the circuit court for a determination that the annexation is in the public interest. If the two regions in question were annexed in a single proceeding, the total land would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Madison v. Village of MononaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Boroo v. Town Board of BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Schmid v. City of StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Town of Waukesha v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Town of Baraboo v. Village of West BarabooCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. City of Lebanon v. Goodin ex rel. GoodinKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API