Loud v. Kezar Falls Woolen Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.
[¶ 1] The employer, Kezar Falls Woolen Co., appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board partially granting its petition for forfeiture. The Board concluded that although the employee’s refusal of an offer of reinstatement employment resulted in a forfeiture of benefits, the employee’s subsequent inquiries into job opportunities, and further layoffs at Kezar Falls, ended “the period of the refusal” pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 214(1)(A) (Supp.1998). We disagree and vacate the decision.
[¶ 2] The employee, Denise Loud, suffered a work-related injury to her low-back on August 1,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Derr v. Murphy Motor Freight LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Demello v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bernier v. Data General Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Hincks v. Robert Mitchell Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Maine Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FolsomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Morrissette v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Holt v. School Administrative District No. 6Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.