Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Hinchliffe & Kenner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1976No. 56033, (Calendar No. 12)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This appeal, taken from a split decision of the Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, concerns the effect of a workmen’s compensation disability award made under the workmen’s compensation laws of the State of California upon plaintiff’s claim for compensation for the same injury filed under Michigan’s Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Specifically we must decide 1) whether under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, 2 a California compensation award acts as a bar to recovery in a Michigan proceeding involving the same injury, and if it is not, 2) whether the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Webster v. Rotary Electric Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hiltz v. Phil's Quality MarketMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Thick v. Lapeer Metal ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Worker's Compensation LienMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.