Kotch v. American Protective Services, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] The employers in this consolidated appeal challenge decisions of hearing officers of the Workers’ Compensation Board finding that the employees have permanent whole body impairments exceeding 11.8%. The decisions mean that the employees are not subject to the 260-week limitation for partial incapacity benefits in 39-A M.R.S.A. § 213 (2001). The employers contend that the hearing officers erred in considering the employees’ permanent whole body impairments which resulted from combining the effects of the work injuries with causally unrelated pre-exist-ing conditions. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dumond v. Aroostook Van LinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Poitras v. R. E. Glidden Body Shop, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Clark v. International Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Churchill v. Central Aroostook Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buckley v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Buckley v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Buckley v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012