Legal Opinion

Precision Standard, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 27, 2006No. 05-1125 CPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, Precision Standard, Inc. (Precision), protests the decision of defendant, acting through the United States Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM or the government), to award a contract to Hawk Enterprises, LLC (Hawk or successful offeror) for aircraft window assemblies for the Black Hawk helicopter. Hawk is defendant-intervenor in the proceeding.

Precision challenges the contract award on the grounds: “(1) that Hawk is not an ap*741proved…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Datamill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Microdyne Outsourcing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Precision Images, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Emerald Coast Finest Produce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API