Legal Opinion

Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 22, 2009No. 08-133CPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record (“motion to supplement”); Intervenor QSS’s Motion to Admit Harm Declaration of Wil*55liam R. Bowen and to Strike Improper Lay Opinion Testimony From Declarations in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Application for Restraining Order (“motion to strike”); and Intervenor QSS Group, Inc.’s Renewed Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Extra-Record Evidence (“renewed motion to strike”). Also before the court, to the extent…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Madison Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Planetspace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Datamill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API