Legal Opinion

Datamill, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-872 CPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF TRE’ BOOK

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court in this post-award bid protest are plaintiffs motion for expedited *725discovery and defendant’s motion to strike the declaration of Tre’ Book (“Book Declaration”). In this action, plaintiff DataMill, Inc. (“DataMill”), an incumbent contractor providing logistics and supply database management support to the Counter Rocket, Artillery Mortar (“C-RAM”) Program Office within the United States Army (“Army”) Aviation Missile Command, asserts that the Army…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Inforeliance Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Proxtronics Dosimetry, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Parcel 49C Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API