Legal Opinion
Microdyne Outsourcing, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 11, 2006No. 06-498CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*231OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff Microdyne/L-3 bid in response to a Request for Proposals to staff the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ National Customer Service Center. USCIS is a division of the Department of Homeland Security, and its Customer Service Center assists DHS in the administration of immigration laws by employing customer service representatives to answer callers’ questions about U.S. immigration benefits. The Solicitation signaled that award would be made to an offeror or offerors who presented bids most advantageous to the Government. US-CIS determined that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Westech International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Mil-Mar Century Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- The McVey Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Akal Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.