Bay v. Hein
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.
This is a lateral support case. Defendant Hein cleared land and excavated soil, to depths ranging from 3 to 8 feet, on his property near and parallel to the line which divides his property from that of plaintiff Bay. Hein’s property lies south of Bay’s property but Hein originally owned both parcels. Beginning at or near the common boundary line the land slopes at about a 45-degree angle toward the south. The cut or excavation was made primarily through fill dirt, some of which may have been placed on the property when Hein owned both parcels.
The principal issue on appeal arises because of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Durante v. AlbaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Muskatell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Knapp v. SiegleyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Bradley v. ValicentiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vikell Investors Pacific, Inc. v. Kip Hampden Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Klebs v. Byung Sik YimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Cifre v. Daas Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Barry Moore, et ux v. Carol HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- David D. Scott and Mary J. Scott v. Robert G. West, Thyra West, Judith C. Clark, Sallie Clingman, Gregory P. Miller, Gaye Miller, Jonathan Bayles, and Amy Bayles, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.