Klebs v. Byung Sik Yim
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
The plaintiffs, Harry Klebs and Lillian E. Hutter, appeal the trial court's order dismissing their complaint and awarding attorney fees to the defendant, Byung Sik Yim. We affirm.
Klebs and Hutter have not challenged or assigned error to any of the trial court's findings of fact. Unchallenged findings of fact become verities on appeal and are treated as the facts of the case. Davis v. Department of Labor & Indus., 94 Wn.2d 119, 123, 615 P.2d 1279 (1980). Accordingly, the trial court's findings of fact, as set forth below, will be treated as the facts of this case.
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Gorton v. SchofieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Simons v. Tri-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trusley v. StatlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Singer v. EtheringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Vikell Investors Pacific, Inc. v. Kip Hampden Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cifre v. Daas Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- David D. Scott and Mary J. Scott v. Robert G. West, Thyra West, Judith C. Clark, Sallie Clingman, Gregory P. Miller, Gaye Miller, Jonathan Bayles, and Amy Bayles, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019