Knapp v. Siegley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— In an action for damages for the alleged removal of lateral support, respondent had verdict and judgment for $1,250 against appellant.
The substance of the complaint is, that the respondent was the owner of a lot on Summit avenue, Seattle, and the appellant was the owner of two lots adjoining-on the north side of respondent’s land and lying- between respondent’s lot and Pine street; that the elevation of all the lots was approximately twelve feet above Summit avenue; that respondent had improved her property with a frame dwelling house and with a lawn, trees and shrubbery. In 1919, appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Gildersleeve v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Hummel v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Muskatell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Bay v. HeinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.