Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Siegley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1922No. 16868PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— In an action for damages for the alleged removal of lateral support, respondent had verdict and judgment for $1,250 against appellant.

The substance of the complaint is, that the respondent was the owner of a lot on Summit avenue, Seattle, and the appellant was the owner of two lots adjoining-on the north side of respondent’s land and lying- between respondent’s lot and Pine street; that the elevation of all the lots was approximately twelve feet above Summit avenue; that respondent had improved her property with a frame dwelling house and with a lawn, trees and shrubbery. In 1919, appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gildersleeve v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hummel v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Muskatell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bay v. HeinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API