Legal Opinion

Van Leuven v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1964No. 244PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The defendant’s first assignment of error is to the ruling • of the court below that the sewer line of the defendant is a burden on plaintiffs’ lot in addition to that of the highway easement for travel, and that the plaintiffs are entitled to maintain this action against the defendant for the imposition of this additional burden.

The State Highway Commission or its duly authorized officers may give in writing a permit to an individual, firm or corporation authorizing the holder of such permit to construct or install a sewer line within the right of way along any highway under the control of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Shugar v. GuillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Huberth v. HollyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Shugar v. GuillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API