Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home Stores
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendants Gibbons and Smith state in their brief that both appellants present the same questions for determination, and therefore they adopt in toto the brief filed by their co-defendant, the Dixie Home Stores, and abandon any of their assignments of error, which are not carried forward and discussed in the brief of their co-defendant. The Dixie Home Stores has not carried forward and discussed in its brief the denial of the court to strike any allegations, except those contained in its own motion. Therefore, we are concerned with identical motions to strike and to make more definite…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Stein v. Asheville City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Gilbert v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.