Legal Opinion

Chadbourne v. German-American Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 16, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion for a New Trial.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This action is brought upon a policy of fire insurance. It was originally procured by Nye & Co., on credit for the premiums, and made payable to the Jennings Lumber Drying Company, mortgagees. This company became the owners of the property, and the policy was confirmed to them, and made payable to the plaintiff as mortgagee. It contained a clause providing that it might be terminated at any time on giving notice to that effect, and that, on surrender of the policy, the defendant should refund any premium that might have been paid, reserving pro rata rates when terminated by the defendant. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. . Lenox Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Bergson v. Builders Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869
  3. International Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Franklin Fire Insurance & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Grace v. American Cent. Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. McDonald v. North River InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Grant Lumber Co. v. North River Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API