Legal Opinion

Bergson v. Builders Insurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

In the policy in this case the company “agrees to make good unto said assured, their executors, administrators and assigns, all such immediate loss or damage, not exceeding the sum insured,” etc. This clause shows that it was contemplated that the policy might be assigned. The whole of the policy is not contained in the record, and from the portions set out it does not appear that there was any restriction upon the power of assignment of the policy by the insured, unless such restriction is found in the blank form endorsed upon the policy, providing for the assent of the insurer to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Sheldon v. . the Atlantic Fire and Marine Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Wakefield v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1799
  5. The Buffalo Steam Engine Works v. . the Sun Mut. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Bridge v. KedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API