Legal Opinion
McDonald v. North River Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.
This action was brought by respondent to recover upon a policy of insurance. The complaint alleges the purchase of an automobile from Folts Motor Car Company by respondent, as part payment for which he executed a title-retaining note for $1,500, which contained the following provision:
“I agree to fully insure said motor car against fire and theft for the benefit of said company, paying the expense thereof, and making policy payable to said company as their interest may appear. In case the said insurance is not procured as above provided then the said company may at its option, obtain such…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- State v. MaguireIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HoaglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Close v. RensinkIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Gridley v. RossIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Hill v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.