Legal Opinion

Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1934No. Appeal, 195PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This action on a policy of insurance .based on a loss sustained by fire resulted in a judgment for the insured. The court below refused to receive an offer of evidence. It was proposed to show, inter alia, that the insurance policy of the Concordia Company was substituted for that of appellant, the Dubuque Insurance Company; second, the agency of Seeley, who negotiated the cancellation and substitution, and, third, the payment of the return premium on the Dubuque policy.

It was admitted that tbe Du-buqne policy was in tbe possession of tbe insured at tbe time of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Stewart v. Coleman & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Phœnix Ins. v. American Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kent v. DAIRYLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Williams v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
  3. Platt v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Moser Manufacturing Co. v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Koehring Company v. VentrescaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API