Legal Opinion

Big Hole Ranchers Ass'n v. United States Forest Service

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 26, 1988No. CV-86-102-BU-PGHPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HATFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Big Hole Ranchers Association, Inc. (“Big Hole Ranchers”), instituted the above-entitled action against the United States Forest Service seeking, inter alia, to enjoin any road building or logging activities in certain portions of the Beaver-head National Forest. Thereafter, Stoltze Land and Lumber Company, Inc. (“Stoltze”) intervened and was joined as a party defendant. This matter is presently before the court on the various defendants’ motions for summary judgment. After careful consideration the court is prepared to rule.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Oregon Natural Resources Council v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  3. National Audubon Society v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996
  4. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. Alaska v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API