Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Lowe
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 24, 1993No. Civ. 92-1121-ASPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ASHMANSKAS, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs, defendants and defendant-intervenors have each moved for summary judgment in plaintiffs’ lawsuit challenging the Forest Service’s management of old growth forests on the Winema National Forest, located on the eastside of the Cascade Mountains in south-central Oregon. For the following reasons, defendants’ summary judgment motion is granted and this case is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs challenge the Forest Service’s actions under two statutes: the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA) and the National Environmental Policy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. John LoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sierra Club v. MaritaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Sierra Club v. MaritaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Sierra Club v. GlickmanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.