Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Glickman
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ and the defendants’ motions, oppositions thereto, and materials submitted by the parties in support of their positions, the defendants’ request for summary judgment on counts I, II and IV of the first amended complaint will granted and the plaintiffs’ motion will be denied.
I. Introduction
A. Summary Judgment Standard
The court decides defendants’ and plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). The parties have had a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Southeast Conference v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Stewart v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- California Forestry Ass'n v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Communities for a Great Northwest, Ltd. v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.