Legal Opinion

Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Glickman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 18, 1995No. Civil 92-0097 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ and the defendants’ motions, oppositions thereto, and materials submitted by the parties in support of their positions, the defendants’ request for summary judgment on counts I, II and IV of the first amended complaint will granted and the plaintiffs’ motion will be denied.

I. Introduction

A. Summary Judgment Standard

The court decides defendants’ and plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). The parties have had a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Southeast Conference v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Stewart v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  4. California Forestry Ass'n v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. Communities for a Great Northwest, Ltd. v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API