Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance Co v. Hayward

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 8, 1983PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The Plaintiff, The Hanover Insurance Company, appeals from a judgment entered after a jury-waived trial in Superior Court (Washington County) denying it punitive damages in its action to recover the insurance it had paid its insured, the Defendant Clinton R. Hayward, Jr. The Defendant cross-appeals, challenging the Superior Court’s ruling that for purposes of this subsequent civil action his prior criminal conviction for arson was conclusive proof of all facts necessarily adjudicated in the earlier criminal conviction. We deny both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

After the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Joseph Segal, and Western States Telephone Co., Inc., Etc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. McAlister v. Slosberg (In Re Slosberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1998
  5. Napier v. Town of WindhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API