Lunsford v. Morris
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KILGARLIN, Justice.
At issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether a defendant’s net worth is subject to pre-trial discovery. We hold that such information is relevant to the issue of punitive or, as they are sometimes called, exemplary damages and therefore discoverable under Tex.R.Civ.P. 166b(2). Consequently, we conditionally grant relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
In the underlying case, relators Lunsford and Dail sued their former employer and others alleging conspiracy and malicious defamation. Their suit sought both actual and punitive damages. In connection with the latter…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.