Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Niziolek
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
In this action, brought by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) against Joseph Niziolek and Ray mond Bednarz to recover money paid by Aetna to Niziolek on a fire insurance policy on a house owned by Niziolek, we hold that: (1) Aetna may invoke the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude Niziolek from relitigating issues decided in the criminal trial in which he was convicted of burning the insured property, and (2) Bednarz’s convictions of arson and of conspiracy to commit arson, entered after he pleaded guilty, have no preclusive effect in subsequent civil litigation, but they are…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Sena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Margo Lynch, Ppa Dennis Lynch, Dennis Lynch and Margaret Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories, Division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. MetzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- James v. PaulSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.