Legal Opinion
Haring v. Prosise
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 13, 1983No. 81-2169PublishedCited by 582 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
The trial court accepted respondent John Franklin Pro-sise’s plea of guilty to one count of manufacturing a controlled substance — phencyclidine. At the hearing at which respondent pleaded guilty, a police officer gave a brief account of the search of respondent’s apartment that led to the discovery of material typically used in manufacturing this substance. Thereafter, Prosise brought a damages action under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 in Federal District Court against petitioner Gilbert A. Haring and the other officers who participated in the search of his apartment. The question presented by this…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by582 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ned Hughes v. Charles LottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
577 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.