Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 15998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

The only question necessary to be considered is that of the statute of limitation. This suit was commenced under sections 8590 and 8591, C. S. 1921, by a resident taxpayer of Pontotoc county, to recover double the amount of certain money alleged to have been unlawfully paid out by the responsible officer of that county to certain parties named and made parties defendant. Sections 8590 and 8591, C. S. 1921, provide:

“Section 8590. Every officer of any county. * * * who shall order or direct the payment of any money or transfer of any property belonging to such county. * * * in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Purcell Bank & Trust Co. of Purcell v. ByarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. State Ex Rel. Gooch v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Schones v. Town of CanuteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Vaughan v. LattaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Cook v. BingmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API