Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gooch v. Drumright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1923No. 10776PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the state, on relation of M. S. Gooch, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error for the purpose of recovering a large sum of money as a penalty pursuant to the provisions of sections 6777 and 6778, Rev. La\vs 1910.

Section 6777, supra, provides generally that every public officer shall be jointly and severally liable to the municipality for double the amount of all sums of money coming into his hands who shall direct the payment of any money or transfer of any property belonging to such municipality in settlement of any claim known to such officer to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Kraft v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Purcell Bank & Trust Co. of Purcell v. ByarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Dowler v. State Ex Rel. PruntySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Schones v. Town of CanuteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API